In short no, but let’s understand why.
Location and alignment of the planets is not relevant from the perspective of ascension. What is relevant is the frequential location or alignment of that which is evolving.
Physical location is simply a location based upon the mathematics of the natural movement of a number of planets’ physical representations around each other relative to a known datum. For instance; there is some conjecture that the planets rotate around a great central sun, whilst others state that it is a black hole and that the alignment of the earth in respect to either datum is significant. The issue here is that it is neither, the lack of ability to agree on what is at the center of the galaxy being a clue to its lack of relevance in terms of ascension.
The physical universe is a single “full” dimensional environment constructed from 3 sub-dimensional components and 12 frequency bands. What we see, the gross physical, is only three of these “lower” frequencies, frequencies that are mostly unseen by the human eye. As the location of the gross physical is a frequential location, it or some parts of it, are exposed to higher frequencies as a result of the work of energetic entities, who, are succeeding in their work to gain evolutionary content through incarnate existence.
The ascension of the physical is then, in reality expansion into the higher frequencies, and what is important is the position of the physical within the frequencies, not its location within the physicality.
From an ascension based perspective then, an optimal frequential location is where the lower aspect of a higher frequency is in an overlapping condition with the higher aspect of a lower frequency, allowing that in the higher aspect of the lower frequency to ascend into the lower aspect of the higher frequency. As we ascend the frequencies we become aligned with these higher frequencies and gain access to the functions associated with them. It’s like tuning a radio into the higher frequencies of its dial. When we align the dial to a frequency we hear a radio station, the radio station being the function of that frequency.
Higher frequencies however, don’t “come” to the earth in “waves”, they are always there. It’s our intension to work in higher frequencies and therefore give ourselves access to the functions associated with higher frequencies, using them as a stepping stone to even higher frequencies that allows us to ascend. And all of this creates evolutionary content.
Although evolution can be understood as personal growth in its raw sense, it is nevertheless accrued in a linear way. Even though evolution can be either directional or spherical, whilst being frequential, multi-dimensional, zonal, etc., in morphology or nature, it can progress in an exponential way provided it is worked on in a linear fashion.
As one experiences more, learns more and evolves more, one is able to experience more in more ways, simultaneous ways, multiple ways, multi-modal ways. The spherical aspect of evolution is the multi-modal aspect of evolution where multiple experiences can be convoluted in their connectivity whilst still providing linear evolution.
All of this however, is based upon a standard model of evolution;
Experiencing + Learning = Increased Evolutionary Content
The Origin is always looking to create new multimodal models to accelerate its own evolution, and in essence we, incarnate mankind, are part of a multimodal model of evolution. Just as the Origin created the Source Entities as part of a multimodal model to accelerate its evolution, so our Source Entity created our true energetic selves as a multimodal model to accelerate its own evolution. Experiencing existence in the gross physical “incarnate” vehicle is one such path of accelerated evolution through a multimodal model.
In essence then, “we are” the Source Entities method of multimodal evolution, and in-turn our Source Entity is one of the Origins models of multimodal evolution – its process for ascension. This process for ascension is therefore not aligned to the location of planetary bodies within a physical universe, but is instead associated with the frequential location or alignment of that which is evolving.
That one was a bit tough to get my head around. So planetary location (“alignment”) is not valid, but rather the location of our physical bodies? Since our physical bodies are the vehicles that represent our frequential location?
More the location of our true energetic selves and what they do with the physical bodies to assist in the ascension of the physical locale, which indicates how our true energetic selves are dealing with the evolutionary process in total from a low frequency perspective. In essence our collective work delivers the frequential ascension of the physical vehicle and the locate it exists within, whilst our actions, as an incarnate aspect of our true energetic self ensures our energetic ascension through our working interface with the lower frequencies of the physical universe, which in itself is an aspect of the multiverse.
Guy, First, thank you for this insight. You have touched on many interesting things here.I would like to delve more into this idea of spherical vs. linear evolution. The idea of a spherical reality comes to mind. If we subscribe that the universe is spherical in existence, then the light of the Source can never be lacking/dim/limited because in a sphere it will reflect off the circular walls. If we accept that the universe is also an expanding hypersphere, then the light might take a very long time to fully expand into the space/volume within the sphere, creating the illusion of linearity. While if linear, then the further from the Source, the more limiting the light – this sets us up for duality thus some are closer to light so they are (incorrectly) perceived to be “better/smarter/brighter” etc. If we apply this aspect of reflectivity, which is created in the spherical approach, to our individual & group evolution, it seems to me that a more efficient mode of accelerating evolutionary growth would be to abandon linearity. In other words, linear reality sets us up for comparisons (duality) and spherical reality sets us up for acceptance of our differences without the assumption that these differences are a reflection of how much light we have and/or are worthy of receiving. Thus, it follows that by being the light, we light the way not only for others, but we also increase the reflectivity of this light within all of existence.
A very good question, both spherical and linear reality are based upon evolutionary content which is accrued personally, and evolutionary content is accrued based upon that which was previously gained. This is the underlying linearity in evolution, if indeed linearity is the correct word to use. If one considers the reflectivity of evolution as in your example, it is not a progression of evolution but is a simply mirror image of that which is already present, which can also lead to duality or “comparison” should one have a level of evolutionary content to compare against, which personally we do not have for evolution is personal. Being the light and lighting the way for others, if used in a “service “based condition, can and does increase personal evolutionary content, provided it is not achieved from an egotistical foundation. Although I use the example of the word spherical to describe the universe and multiverse, it is, in fact not. It is immorphose as a result of the frequential content of the energetic entities (incarnate or otherwise) and their evolutionary content, for frequential and evolutionary content are symbiotic in this multiversal condition created by our Source Entity. Feel free to ask further questions if this is not understood. Guy