Tyrants of the Earth – Uncommon Channelled Dialogues Illustrating Why Leaders Turn To Tyranny is a series of dialogues with disincarnate and incarnate entities that were significant leaders in Earth’s history, whose leadership turned to tyranny.
In these dialogues we learn that the common goal of “wanting to improve the life of incarnates on the Earth” goes wrong as the leaders themselves become addicted to the power, status and wealth they experience as leaders. That being in the very position of major influence lures them into the low frequency thoughts behaviours and actions they feel are necessary to accelerate their plans for improvement, creating a single focus of such intensity that they become tyrants. There are 3 formats, Paperback, Kindle eBook and Audio Book.
A sample of the text is below:
The Entity Called Adolf Hitler
The Pre-Incarnation Expectation
I wanted to know a few things about what happens behind the scenes before the incarnation process starts. I wanted to know what such entities go through as a function of their life plan. I knew from my work with Anne (See The Anne Dialogues – GSN) that the life plan an Aspect decides upon is a function of a combination of the evolutionary desires of the Aspects True Energetic Self (TES), the experiences and associated skills and evolutionary content of the Aspect to be deployed into the situations associated with the life plan, and, the experiential desires of the Aspect itself. All of this is coupled together with any karmic issues that need to be addressed. This of course is what the so called average Aspect has to consider. I expect that an Aspect that has planned to be in a leadership role has to consider many other things, as well as accessing the Akashic records to gain second, third or “many” hand knowledge and experiences that neither the TES or any other Aspects associated with its TES have experienced first-hand, to assist it in its incarnate role. The thing that I really wanted to know was how does an Aspect prepare itself when it is due to have a significant level of low frequency energy – negativity/hate etc., focussed or broadcast towards it as a function of its work. This of course from an experientially linear human perspective and is therefore experienced during and after the incarnation. I came to the conclusion that such entities are either crazy or significantly well prepared and are normally from a highly evolved location within the multiverse. I mean, why would an entity put itself through so much stress? Before I could even offer further conjecture AH offered to share something of its own pre-life and life plan.
AHES: The decision to be a leader of significant influence is not taken lightly by any entity, irrespective of the previous experiential content of an entity in this level of responsibility. The decision to be classified as a dictator or tyrant figure and experience the tsunami of negative energy associated with those affected by the decision and interactive experiences resulting from such a position of power, is taken by very few, almost to the point of no one.
ME: What made you take this role, I mean, the downstream functions of the decision and actions you made in your incarnation, and the subsequent hatred directed towards you are being experienced today, eighty years after you left your incarnation!
AHES: Yes but it’s nothing in the greater scheme of things from the energetic perspective.
ME: What do you mean?
AHES: Eventually the true meaning behind the role is understood by those in the incarnate state because they can see the educational content and the opportunities to avoid the incorrect directions that are taken. Ensuring that they are not taken again.
ME: I would agree with that to a certain point, but we live in a linear existence and the mistakes of the past, although recognised in the near present, are forgotten in the future as the generations pass and the intensity of the memory deteriorates to the point where the learning through remembrance disappears into mediocrity. At this point the same mistakes can happen again, and without warning.
AHES: Again from the energetic perspective such roles are intense when in the incarnate state. If incarnate human kind decides to, after a period, ignore the signs that they are going down a road that created the possibility of a leadership role to be considered as “tyrant” then that is a level of experience that they have collectively chosen to make. As a result the energies are associated with group Karma as well as being directed towards the entity that is classified as tyrant. As a result they are not intensely focussed upon the entity in this role in totality because the decision to place the entity in this role is a collective responsibility as well.
ME: Are you suggesting that you chose this role knowing that the focus of low frequency energy during and after your role, was in essence, shared by the collective of incarnate entities of the time because they shared the responsibility of “making your role happen”?
AHES: Yes. There’s always a shared level of responsibility associated with the average incarnate Aspects who elect to be incarnate in the era, location and circumstances of the Aspect that is to incarnate into the role of the tyrant because they have a supporting role, irrespective of how minor it is.
ME: So the shared responsibility dissipates the negative energy that is focused onto the tyrant making the current and downstream effects of the role more acceptable to the Aspect that elects to be in such a role.
AHES: Yes.
ME: And the learning is not to go down such a route in the future?
AHES: Not necessarily.
ME: What do you mean?
AHES: Incarnate human kind, with its individualised free will, is quite capable of collectively forgetting the reasons for the potential for the creation of the conditions necessary for a tyrant figure to be invoked.
ME: Care to elaborate?
AHES: As you know incarnate human kind exists in the lowest of the frequencies and as a result has a collective linear memory set. The collective memory is only recorded by those who are involved in some way, either passive or active, with the interactive circumstances that are being experienced. As the Event Stream progresses the churn of incarnate Aspects results in the gradual reduction of Aspects that have been involved, irrespective of their role, and so the collective memory dissipates.
ME: That’s not strictly true though because we have our actions recorded in our history books (news, internet, universities), we have memorial services and create areas of memory (statues, Parks etc.) to help us remember what happened and do our best to not do it again.
AHES: That doesn’t/isn’t work/ing though. It only takes a couple of generations of Aspects to incarnate for the intensity of the experience to dissipate into the background because it doesn’t affect them. The fact that it happened is immaterial because it didn’t involve them in this incarnation and so they are divorced from it. It is when they get totally divorced from the circumstances or reasons why a tyrant figure manifests that they drift away from the desire to be part of a collective and the collective memory set that was created by those incarnate Aspects that interacted with each other in the era of the tyrant figure and become individualised, thinking only of themselves. Think about it. In times of strife where all of incarnate human kind are affected by a catastrophic event it adopts a collective mindset and both individuals and communities of collective individuals work together to help each other survive and move on. However, when there are no events that affect the community adversely the community dissipates because the individuals within the community have nothing to focus their higher cognitive functions on other than themselves. In essence they become individualistic and selfish, focussing only on self-aggrandisement and materialism. It is the self-aggrandisement and materialism that creates detachment from the collective memory set….
ME: ….And detachment from the collective memory set results in the potential for the old mistakes to be made again in the current linear version of the now because what happened didn’t affect them.
AHES: Exactly, and this is the breeding ground for the thoughts behaviours and actions that creates the conditions for a tyrant figure to appear.
ME: So even with memorial services, memorial buildings, historic and analytical documentaries, films, etc., etc., the generations of incarnate Aspects that are further along the Event Stream actively ignore the warning signs that appear to them, to everyone.
AHES: Yes.
ME: Why is that?
AHES: Because the tyrant figure can range from being hidden until too late and therefor be opportunistic, appearing to be a saviour in times of strife, to being hidden in plain sight – through being attractive by having a charismatic and/or coercive personality, so to speak, to promising an attractive vision of the near future that the individual will certainly benefit from. All of which creates the potential for corruption in order to support ones status or the potential to improve one’s status.
ME: Many people would consider that a tyrant figure is aggressive and evil. Killing people, torturing people, reducing their buildings to rubble, creating totalitarian or fear based way of control, removing those that get in the way, decimating communities. Would this be an accurate way to describe a tyrant?
AHES: That’s a fairly back and white (linear) way to look at it.
ME: Is it correct though?
AHES: No.
ME: So what you are saying is that a tyrant figure doesn’t have to be a military leader, as you were, they can be a very acceptable and amenable individual that slowly erodes the benefits of individualised free will in a way that is either un-noticeable in totality, or, that only a few can see, with the rest of the population remaining in blissful ignorance.
AHES: Correct.
The answer that suggested we might willingly accept a tyrant was both a shocking revelation and stark wake-up call. We need to be both individually and collectively vigilant I thought.